Toggle menu

Private Sector Housing Civil Financial Penalty Policy

Civil penalties under the Renters' Rights Act 2025 and other housing legislation

In this policy, the term 'landlord' should be read as including letting agents, managing agents, licensors, property owners, corporate landlords, directors of corporate landlords, registered providers of social housing and any other person involved in the letting or management of accommodation.

In this policy, the term 'corporate landlord' should be read as referring to a body corporate that meets the definition of 'landlord' above.

In this policy, the terms 'House in Multiple Occupation' or 'HMO' are defined by the Housing Act 2004.

The following breaches are subject to a civil penalty with a statutory maximum of £7,000

  • failure to give a written statement of terms and any other prescribed information under section 16D of the Housing Act 1988
  • attempting to let a property for a fixed term under section 16E of the Housing Act 1988
  • attempting to end a tenancy by service of a notice to quit under section 16E of the Housing Act 1988
  • attempting to end a tenancy orally or requiring that it is ended orally under section 16E of the Housing Act 1988
  • serving an eviction notice that attempts to end a tenancy outside the prescribed section 8 process under section 16E of the Housing Act 1988
  • relying on a ground where the landlord does not reasonably believe that the landlord is/will be able to obtain possession under section 16E of the Housing Act 1988
  • failing to provide a tenant with prior notice that a ground which requires it may be used under section 16E of the Housing Act 1988
  • failure to give an existing tenant prescribed information about changes made by the Renters' Rights Act 2025 in the prescribed form and timeframe under paragraph 7(2) of schedule 6 to the Renters' Rights Act 2025
  • discrimination relating to children in the lettings process under section 33 of the Renters' Rights Act 2025
  • discrimination relating to benefits in the lettings process under section 34 of the Renters' Rights Act 2025
  • failure to specify proposed rent within a written advertisement or offer under section 56 of the Renters' Rights Act 2025
  • inviting, encouraging or accepting any offer of rent greater than the stated rate under section 56 of the Renters' Rights Act 2025

The following breaches are subject to a civil penalty with a statutory maximum of £40,000

  • breach of duty under Regulation 3, 3B, 3C, and 3D of The Electrical Safety Standards in the Private Rented Sector and Social Rented Sector (England) Regulations 2020

The following offences are subject to a civil penalty with a statutory maximum of £40,000

  • unlawful eviction and harassment of occupier under section 1 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977
  • continuation of conduct subject to a relevant penalty (under s.16I or s.16K Housing Act 1988) after the 28-day period (or, if appealed, after conclusion of the appeal) where the final notice has not been withdrawn under section 16J of the Housing Act 1988
  • conduct giving rise to liability under s.16I, where within the preceding five years the landlord has either
    1. had a relevant penalty (under s.16I or s.16K Housing Act 1988) imposed for different conduct and the final notice has not been withdrawn
    2. been convicted under s.16J for different conduct under section 16(J) of the Housing Act 1988
  • relying on a ground knowing the landlord would not be able to obtain possession or being reckless as to whether they would under section 16J of the Housing Act 1988
  • breach of restrictions relating to reletting (s16(E)(2) Housing Act 1988) or remarketing (s16(E)(3) Housing Act 1988) a property within restricted period after using Grounds 1 or 1A of Schedule 2 Housing Act 1988 under section 16J of the Housing Act 1988
    • breach of a banning order under section 21 of the Housing and Planning Act 2016
    • failure to comply with an Improvement Notice under section 30 of the Housing Act 2004
    • contravention of an overcrowding notice under section 139 of the Housing Act 2004
    • failure to obtain a selective licence under section 95 of the Housing Act 2004
    • failure to obtain an HMO licence under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004
    • knowingly permitting over-occupation of an HMO under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004
  • failure to comply with management regulations in respect of HMOs under section 234 of the Housing Act 2004
    • failure to comply with HMO licence conditions under section 72 of the Housing Act 2004
    • failure to comply with selective licence conditions under section 95 of the Housing Act 2004

If a landlord has committed multiple breaches or offences, a separate civil penalty can, and usually will, be imposed for each breach and offence. In each case, the level of any civil penalty imposed will be determined in accordance with this policy.

If multiple landlords have committed the same breach or offence at the same property, a separate civil penalty can, and usually will, be imposed on each offender. In each case, the level of civil penalty imposed on each offender will be in accordance with this policy.

This policy outlines the Council's methodology and mechanism for assessing and setting the level of a civil penalty at all stages where a civil penalty is under consideration, including the preparation of a notice of intent, and where a final decision has been made to impose a civil penalty.

When applying the civil penalties matrix, interim calculations at individual stages may result in figures that exceed the statutory maximum. Where the final amount reached following application of all relevant steps exceeds the statutory maximum, the civil penalty will be reduced to the applicable statutory maximum.

The Council considers the need for transparency and consistency to be of primary importance to ensure fairness in the discharge of its functions. The general objective of this policy is, therefore, to promote both transparency and consistency in the imposition of financial penalties so that those involved in the letting or management of accommodation (a) know how the Council will generally penalise relevant breaches and offences and (b) are assured that, generally, like cases will be penalised similarly, and different cases penalised differently.

The Council recognises that, despite its best efforts, landlords may operate unlawfully for a significant period without detection, and that only a proportion of those committing relevant breaches and offences will be identified. Accordingly, the Council seeks to ensure that civil penalties are set at a level that makes it clear to the landlord concerned and to others that operating unlawfully as a landlord is financially disadvantageous when compared to operating lawfully.

The Council has a duty to act fairly, transparently and consistently when assessing civil penalties. To maintain fairness between all landlords, the Council will not give weight to claims advanced as factors that might reduce the amount of a civil penalty unless those claims are supported by evidence that the Council reasonably considers to be relevant, reliable, credible, and sufficient in scope and detail to enable proper assessment of the claim, having regard to the nature of the claim, the information ordinarily available to the landlord, and the need for consistent and fair decision-making. Allowing inadequately evidenced assertions to influence outcomes would risk rewarding those who provide incomplete or misleading information and would create an unfair advantage over landlords who provide a full and properly evidenced account. Accordingly, the Council expects landlords against whom a civil penalty is being considered to provide all documents and records that would ordinarily exist if their account were accurate. Where such evidence is not provided, and no explanation that the Council considers adequate is given, the Council may draw an adverse inference.

Where claims are advanced without sufficient supporting evidence, the Council may request specified supporting material before determining whether to issue a final notice or whether any mitigation has been sufficiently evidenced so as to justify a lower civil penalty.

The further objectives of using financial penalties in particular as a means of enforcing the above breaches and offences are explained below.

Last modified on 26 February 2026