Rationale for scoring: 2 unitary authorities
5) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal has been informed by local views and will meet local needs?
- 1 unitary authority: strongly disagree
- 2 unitary authorities: strongly disagree
- 3 unitary authorities: strongly agree
Engagement was broad but not deep
The proposal cites 804 survey responses and 446,000 campaign impressions, but this is a small sample compared to Norfolk's population of over 930,000. It is unclear whether this reflects fully local views or delivers the local accountability people want. The evidence provided does not justify strong confidence this will be achieved.
Local priorities identified, but not fully addressed
Residents highlighted improved services and stronger local decision-making as top priorities. The proposed councils have remained very large which risks leaving rural and coastal communities feeling remote from decision-makers.
Local identity concerns remain
While the proposal claims to preserve identity, grouping Norwich with East Norfolk combines very different communities and priorities. This will dilute local voice and create tensions between urban and rural needs.
Evidence of listening is limited
The proposal references engagement themes but does not clearly show how feedback shaped the final boundaries or governance model. Key concerns such as avoiding remoteness appear unresolved.
