Toggle menu

Great Yarmouth Borough Council's response to Government consultation on Local Government Reorganisation in Norfolk

The following table indicates the Council's response to each of the consultation questions about the three unitary authority options proposed to replace the existing local authorities in Norfolk.

How each question for the consultation was scored by the Council
Question1 unitary authority2 unitary authorities3 unitary authorities
1) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal suggests a council that is based on a sensible geography and economic area?1UA1: strongly disagree2UA1: strongly disagree3UA1: strongly agree

2) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed council will be able to deliver the outcomes they describe in the proposal?

1UA2: strongly disagree2UA2: strongly disagree3UA2: strongly agree

3) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed council is the right size to be efficient, improve capacity and withstand financial shocks?

1UA3: strongly disagree2UA3: strongly disagree3UA3: strongly agree

4) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposed council will deliver high quality, sustainable public services?

1UA4: strongly disagree2UA4: strongly disagree3UA4: strongly agree
5) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal has been informed by local views and will meet local needs?1UA5: strongly disagree2UA5: strongly disagree3UA5: strongly agree
6) To what extent do you agree or disagree that establishing the councils in this proposal will support devolution arrangements, for example, the establishment of a strategic authority?1UA6: strongly disagree2UA6: disagree3UA6: strongly agree

7) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal enables stronger community engagement and gives the opportunity for neighbourhood empowerment?

1UA7: strongly disagree2UA7: strongly disagree3UA7: strongly agree
9) This proposal is accompanied by a request that the Secretary of State considers boundary change. To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal sets out a strong public services and financial sustainability justification for boundary change?not applicablenot applicable3UA9: strongly agree

Question 8 allowed for a detailed response to the other questions: these responses are expanded upon in the following sections:

Last modified on 03 February 2026