Rationale for scoring: 3 unitary authorities
5) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal has been informed by local views and will meet local needs?
- 1 unitary authority: strongly disagree
- 2 unitary authorities: strongly disagree
- 3 unitary authorities: strongly agree
Extensive engagement programme
Over 5,403 survey responses, 100+ public and partner events, and direct contact with 304,500 households show strong public involvement.
Broad stakeholder input
Town and parish councils, MPs, businesses, voluntary sector, health and education partners all contributed, ensuring diverse perspectives shaped the proposal.
Clear alignment with community priorities
Feedback emphasised accountability, local identity, and financial sustainability which are core principles embedded in the design of the proposal.
Place-based approach
Each unitary reflects distinct local needs:
- Greater Norwich: Tackles urban deprivation and housing pressures.
- East Norfolk: Addresses coastal challenges, energy sector growth, and rural isolation.
- West Norfolk: Focuses on ageing population, connectivity, and rural service delivery.
Strong political backing
Supported by 8 out of 10 Norfolk MPs, demonstrating broad democratic and cross-party endorsement.