Rationale for scoring: 3 unitary authorities
1) To what extent do you agree or disagree that the proposal suggests a council that is based on a sensible geography and economic area?
- 1 unitary authority: strongly disagree
- 2 unitary authorities: strongly disagree
- 3 unitary authorities: strongly agree
Distinct geographies reflected
The three proposed unitaries align with real-world patterns of how people live, work, and travel, rather than boundaries set in 1974. This ensures councils are rooted in genuine communities (city, coast, countryside).
Functional economic areas
Each unitary is designed around coherent economic zones:
- Greater Norwich: a fast-growing city-region and economic engine with strong knowledge, creative, and life sciences sectors
- East Norfolk: the "Energy Coast," nationally significant for offshore wind, carbon capture, and tourism
- West Norfolk: a productive rural heartland with agri-tech, advanced manufacturing, and strategic connectivity to the Midlands and Cambridgeshire
Balanced tax bases and sustainability
The model creates three authorities with robust and balanced tax bases, avoiding undue advantage or disadvantage for any area and ensuring financial resilience for the future.
Supports housing and growth
Logical boundaries enable coordinated housing delivery and infrastructure planning while responding to local needs through Growth Plans and Spatial Development Strategies.
Respects local identity
The proposal considers cultural and historic importance of key conurbations in Norfolk anchoring councils in Norwich, Great Yarmouth, and King's Lynn and protecting distinct rural, coastal, and urban identities.